Script 閱讀文本
Today we will explore an extremely important issue, which is medical records and personal data protection. In our country’s medical legal system, few people discuss it from the perspective of personal data protection. However, in reality, medical records are not only medical records but also important data involving personal privacy. Below, we will discuss the relationship between medical records and the Personal Data Protection Act using a case study.
■ Case Description
This case involves individual A, who, over a decade, exploited their position at a medical center to sell patients’ medical records to pharmaceutical companies for huge profits. This is not only a serious violation of patients privacy but also a severe breach of the Personal Data Protection Act. Let’s discuss from two points of contention.
■ Point of Contention
Analysis Firstly, whether medical records fall within the scope of the Personal Data Protection Act? According to the provisions of the Personal Data Protection Act, medical records are explicitly categorized as a type of personal data and are subject to strict protection. This is because medical records involve individuals’ health conditions, making them highly sensitive data, which should not be collected, processed, or utilized. Secondly, what are the legal responsibilities for unauthorized use of patients’ medical records? According to relevant provisions of the Personal Data Protection Act, unauthorized use of medical records without patients’ consent is illegal and may result in civil and criminal liabilities. On the civil side, patients can claim damages and exercise this right within a certain statute of limitations. On the criminal side, infringing on personal data may be considered a criminal offense, leading to criminal prosecution and corresponding penalties.
■ Conclusion
This case is not just an isolated incident; it reflects the problems and loopholes in our personal data protection. Especially in the current era of prevalent big data technology, protecting personal data is particularly crucial. We need to manage and protect personal data more strictly while strengthening supervision and crackdowns on illegal activities. In summary, this case reminds us not to overlook personal data protection. We should enhance the publicity and enforcement of the Personal Data Protection Act, establish a more complete legal system, and safeguard peoples privacy rights and personal data security. Let’s work together to build a safer and more orderly society.
Translation 中文翻譯
今天我們將探討一個極其重要的議題，那就是病歷與個人資料保護。在我國的醫療法制中，很少有人從個人資料保護的角度來討論。但實際上，病歷不僅是醫療記錄，更是涉及個人隱私的重要資料。以下我們將以一個案例為例，來論述病歷與個人資料保護法之間的關聯性。
■ 案例說明
這個案例是關於甲在十餘年間，利用其在醫學中心的職務之便，將患者的病歷轉售給藥廠，從中牟取暴利的行為。這不僅是對患者隱私的嚴重侵犯，也是對個人資料保護法的嚴重違反。讓我們從兩個爭點出發來進行討論。
■ 爭點解析
首先，病歷是否屬於個人資料保護法的保護範疇？根據個資法的規定，病歷被明確列為個人資料的一種類型，並且受到嚴格的保護。這是因為病歷涉及到個人的健康狀況，是極為敏感的資料，因此在原則上不得被蒐集、處理或利用。 其次，在患者不知情的情況下擅自利用其病歷，其法律責任如何？根據個資法的相關規定，未經患者同意擅自利用病歷是違法的，將會導致民事和刑事責任。在民事方面，患者可以請求損害賠償，並在一定時效內行使這個權利。在刑事方面，侵犯個資可能被視為犯罪行為，將面臨刑事起訴和相應的刑罰。
■ 總結
這個案例不僅僅是一個個案，它反映出我們在個人資料保護方面存在的問題和漏洞。特別是在當今大數據技術盛行的情況下，個人資料的保護顯得尤為重要。我們需要更加嚴格地管理和保護個人資料，同時加強對違法行為的監管和打擊。 總的來說，這個案例提醒我們個人資料保護不容忽視。我們應該加強對個人資料保護法的宣傳和執行，建立更加完善的法律制度，以保障人們的隱私權和個人資料安全。讓我們共同努力，為建設一個更加安全和有序的社會而努力奮鬥。
CHECK THIS OUT 學習知識點
‘Protecting personal data is particularly crucial.’
In English, every verb must always have a subject. You can have two types of subjects, a noun phrase, which is the most common type of subject, or a V-ing, which is also quite common. Here you can see the subject is a V-ing.
「保護個人資料尤其關鍵。」
在英文中，每個動詞必須始終有一個主詞。你可以有兩種類型的詞，一種是名詞片語，這是最常見的主詞類型，另一種是 V-ing，也相當常見。在這裡，你可以看到主詞是 V-ing。
