Script 閱讀文本
Carbon trading, as part of carbon pricing mechanisms, is considered a crucial tool for implementing effective carbon reduction actions. At its core, carbon trading involves treating carbon emissions or their allowances as commodities, traded in the market, thereby harnessing market forces to drive carbon reduction efforts. The development of this mechanism can be traced back to the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, which initiated the first steps towards international carbon trading and established the so-called “Kyoto Mechanisms”. Within this framework, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) has been the most widely understood and applied, allowing developed countries to assist developing ones in reducing carbon emissions and obtaining Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) through project applications, thus offsetting their own emissions.
However, despite nearly 20 years of development, carbon trading has only matured gradually in recent years. This is mainly due to increasing global pressure to reduce carbon emissions, leading to a rapid rise in demand for carbon credits or allowances. With the fervor of the carbon trading market, related information has become increasingly intricate, leading to misunderstandings and erroneous judgments regarding carbon trading. Governments, businesses, academia, and investors across various sectors need a clear understanding of carbon trading mechanisms to fully leverage their advantages while mitigating potential risks.
First and foremost, the carbon trading market must be clearly defined to avoid confusion and misjudgment. Carbon trading markets can be categorized into two main types: mandatory markets and voluntary markets. Mandatory markets are established by governments and possess a legal basis, such as the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Voluntary markets, on the other hand, are set up and certified by private organizations, such as Verra and Gold Standard. The commodities and trading rules differ between these two markets and thus must be distinguished.
Opportunities exist within voluntary markets, as many companies actively participate in voluntary carbon reduction projects to acquire carbon credits. However, this also brings potential risks and challenges. For instance, issues of carbon credit quality stability and cost-effectiveness need to be addressed.
To tackle the problems within voluntary markets, the Voluntary Carbon Market Integrity Initiative has proposed ten core carbon principles, covering governance, emission impacts, and sustainable development, among others. These principles aim to enhance the quality and transparency of carbon credits, thereby promoting the healthy development of the carbon trading market.
In conclusion, while carbon trading markets present opportunities, they also face various challenges and risks. By adhering to relevant principles and strengthening market oversight, the issues within carbon trading markets can be effectively addressed, driving carbon emission reduction actions and achieving more sustainable and environmentally friendly development goals.
Translation 中文翻譯
碳交易作為碳定價機制的一部分，被視為實施有效的減碳行動的重要機制之一。其核心在於將碳排放或其相關額度視為一種商品，在市場上進行交易，從而利用市場力量推動減碳行動。這個機制的發展歷程可以追溯到 1997 年《京都議定書》的通過，該議定書開啟了國際碳交易的第一步，並建立了所謂的「京都機制」。在這個機制中，「清潔發展機制」(CDM) 是最為廣泛了解和應用的一個，它允許發達國家協助發展中國家減少碳排放，並通過申請計畫取得「減排認證」(CER)，從而可以抵消自身的碳排放。
然而，儘管碳交易已經發展了近 20 年，但直到近年才逐漸成熟。這主要是由於全球減碳壓力的增加，導致對碳信用或碳抵換額度的需求迅速增加。隨著碳交易市場的熱絡，相關信息也變得錯綜複雜，這導致了對碳交易的誤解和錯誤判斷。各個領域的政府、企業、學術界和投資者都需要對碳交易機制有清晰的了解，以充分利用碳交易的優勢，同時避免潛在的風險。
首先，碳交易市場必須清晰界定，以避免混淆和錯誤判斷。碳交易市場可以分為兩大類：強制性市場和自願性市場。強制性市場由政府設置，具有公權力基礎，如 EU ETS 即為一例。而
自願性市場則由民間組織自行設置和認證，例如 Verra 和 Gold Standard。這兩種市場的商品和交易規則有所不同，因此必須加以區分。自願性市場中存在著商機，許多企業積極參與自願減碳計畫，以取得碳信用。然而，這也帶來了潛在的風險和挑戰。例如，碳額度的品質穩定性和成本效益問題需要引起重視。
為了解決自願性市場中存在的問題，自願性碳市場誠信協會提出了十項核心碳原則，包括治理、排放衝擊和永續發展等方面。這些原則旨在提升碳額度的品質和市場透明度，從而推動碳交易市場的健康發展。
總的來說，碳交易市場雖然存在著商機，但也面臨著各種挑戰和風險。通過遵循相關原則，加強市場監管，可以有效解決碳交易市場中的問題，推動碳排放減量行動，從而實現更加永續和環保的發展目標。
CHECK THIS OUT 學習知識點
‘To tackle the problems within voluntary markets, the Voluntary Carbon Market Integrity Initiative has proposed ten core carbon principles,’
Notice that at the beginning of the sentence we have ‘to V’ This is to describe purpose. In Taiwan it’s sometimes common to see ‘for Ving’ to describe purpose, but this is wrong. Use ‘to V’ to describe purpose.
「為了解決自願性市場中存在的問題，自願性碳市場誠信協會提出了十項核心碳原則，」
請注意，在句子的開頭使用的是「to V」。這是為了描述目的。在台灣，有時常見「for Ving」來描述目的，但這是錯誤的。請使用「to V」。
關聯學習：字彙高點：進階英文必考替換同義字
推薦課程：知識達雲端英語課程
