聽讀英文 – 人文與社會:UBI 全民基本收入議題興起 (音)|貝塔語測
聽讀英文 – 人文與社會:UBI 全民基本收入議題興起 (音)

Facebook  Facebook  
By  Quentin Brand

Script 閱讀文本

In an era defined by technological advancements and economic uncertainties, the concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI) has emerged as a compelling solution to address poverty, inequality, and the changing nature of work. With growing interest from policymakers and public figures, UBI has become a subject of intense debate and contemplation. 

At its core, Universal Basic Income is a social welfare program that guarantees a periodic, unconditional cash payment to every individual within a given population, regardless of their employment status or income level. The primary aim of UBI is to provide a financial safety net that enables citizens to meet their basic needs, such as food, shelter, and healthcare, without facing the dire consequences of poverty. 

Proponents of UBI argue that this approach can create economic stability and foster innovation. By providing a stable income, UBI can help lift people out of poverty, reduce income inequality, and stimulate consumer spending, thereby boosting the economy. Moreover, UBI may encourage entrepreneurship and risk-taking as individuals have a safety net to fall back on during times of uncertainty. 

As automation and artificial intelligence continue to reshape the job market, concerns over job displacement have become more pronounced. UBI is seen by some as a viable response to the potential mass unemployment caused by technological disruption. By guaranteeing a basic income, individuals may have the means to retrain, pursue higher education, or engage in creative endeavors, leading to a more adaptable and resilient workforce. 

While the idea of UBI is appealing, critics raise various concerns. One of the most significant challenges is the cost of implementing such a program. Financing UBI would require substantial public funds, and the method of funding remains a contentious issue. Critics also argue that providing a universal income could disincentivize work, leading to reduced labor force participation and potential negative impacts on productivity. Additionally, some critics suggest that a targeted approach to social welfare programs may be more effective, ensuring resources reach those who need them most, rather than providing a universal benefit. 

To better understand the potential effects of UBI, numerous pilot programs and experiments have been conducted around the world. Countries like Finland, Canada, and Kenya have implemented UBI trials, with mixed results. These experiments have provided valuable insights into the real-world impact of UBI, shedding light on its implications for labor markets, poverty reduction, and overall well-being. 

As societies grapple with economic uncertainties and income disparities, Universal Basic Income remains a topic of conversation at local, national, and global levels. The future of UBI hinges on further research, experimentation, and thoughtful policy design. While the concept may not be a panacea for all societal challenges, it has undeniably sparked essential discussions about the evolving nature of work, social welfare, and economic security in the modern world.

Translation 中文翻譯
在一個技術進步和經濟不確定性的時代,全民基本收入 (UBI) 的概念已成為解決貧困、不平等和工作性質變化的一個令人信服的解決方案。隨著政策制定者和公眾人物的興趣日益濃厚,全民基本收入已成為激烈辯論和思考的主題。 
全民基本收入的核心是一項社會福利計劃,保證向特定人口中的每個人定期、無條件地支付現金,無論其就業狀況或收入水平如何。全民基本收入的主要目標是提供一個金融安全網,使公民能夠滿足他們的基本需求,例如食物、住房和醫療保健,而不必面臨貧困的可怕後果。 
UBI 的支持者認為,這種方法可以創造經濟穩定並促進創新。 通過提供穩定的收入,全民基本收入可以幫助人們擺脫貧困,減少收入不平等,刺激消費者支出,從而提振經濟。此外,全民基本收入可能鼓勵創業和冒險,因為個人在不確定時期有一個可以依靠的安全網。 
隨著自動化和人工智能繼續重塑就業市場,人們對工作崗位流失的擔憂變得更加明顯。一些人認為全民基本收入是應對技術顛覆造成的潛在大規模失業的可行對策。透過保證基本收入,個人可以有辦法接受再培訓、接受高等教育或從事創造性工作,從而培養出更具適應性和彈性的勞動力。 
雖然全民基本收入的想法很有吸引力,但批評者提出了各種擔憂。最重大的挑戰之一是實施此類計劃的成本。全民基本收入的融資需要大量公共資金,而融資方式仍然是一個有爭議的問題。批評者還認為,提供全民收入可能會抑制工作積極性,導致勞動力參與度下降,並對生產力產生潛在的負面影響。此外,一些批評者認為,有針對性的社會福利計劃可能更有效,確保資源惠及最需要的人,而不是提供全民福利。 
為了更好地了解全民基本收入的潛在影響,世界各地開展了大量試點計劃和實驗。芬蘭、加拿大和肯尼亞等國家已經實施了全民基本收入試驗,但結果好壞參半。 這些實驗為了解全民基本收入對現實世界的影響提供了寶貴的見解,揭示了其對勞動力市場、減貧和整體福祉的影響。 
隨著社會努力應對經濟不確定性和收入差距,全民基本收入仍然是地方、國家和全球層面的話題。UBI 的未來取決於進一步的研究、實驗和深思熟慮的政策設計。雖然這一概念可能不是解決所有社會挑戰的靈丹妙藥,但不可否認的是,它引發了有關現代世界工作性質、社會福利和經濟安全不斷變化的重要討論。
CHECK THIS OUT 學習知識點
In the third paragraph the word ‘proponent’ means the opposite of ‘opponent’. We use it to describe someone who is for an idea or a proposal, not against it. Here are some more sentences using this word. 
‘The politician was a vocal proponent of education reform, pushing for improved resources and higher teacher salaries.’ 
‘John is a strong proponent of healthy living, promoting regular exercise and balanced diets among his friends and family.’           
在第三段中,「opponent(支持者)」是「反對者」的反義詞,用以形容某人支持某個想法或建議,而不是反對它。這裡還有一些使用這個詞的句子。 
「這位政治家是教育改革的直言不諱的支持者,推動改善資源和提高教師工資。」 
「約翰是健康生活的堅定支持者,在他的朋友和家人中提倡定期鍛煉和均衡飲食。」
IRT 作題評量,診斷學習強弱
本篇文章提供學習測驗
Quiz

Q1: What is the main topic of the article?

A. Universal Basic Income

B. the job market


C. social welfare

 

Q2: In the fourth paragraph, what do the words ‘job displacement’ mean?

A. losing your job

B. the number of jobs available goes down


C. getting fired

 

Q3: What is the main concern of critics of UBI?

A. the cost of implementing it

B. it will help to lift people out of poverty


C. it will have mixed results



Answers: 
Q1: A Q2: B Q3: A

關聯閱讀
英文閱讀越好:人物篇
文章分類:跨學科聲動網   時事專題  閱讀
關鍵字: